Lamb, Meters. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Sensed similarity and you can relationships profits one of relationships lovers: A keen idiographic strategy
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). In the event the I’m not scorching, could you be very hot or otherwise not?: Physical-elegance evaluations and relationships needs because the a purpose of your individual appeal. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage and other romantic relationships. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of aspiration. From inside the J. McV. Check (Ed.), Character as well as the behavior problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Backlinks ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationships fate that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ direction: Just who and you may what is actually requested things. Private Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship quality in newly weds: One or two depending approach. Log from Personality and you may Societal Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Internet dating. Arizona, DC: Statement for the Pew Web sites & Western Existence Enterprise. Recovered , out-of [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Assessing the accuracy off predictions on the matchmaking dating: Just how and just why would lovers’ forecasts vary from those individuals created by perceiver? Identity and you can Social Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing activities regarding initiation from heterosexual relationships. Paper shown at Earliest Around the globe Conference on Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, E.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.An excellent. (2000). Electronic matchmaking and virtual relevant: Conceptualizing computer system mediated intimate matchmaking. Family relations, 49, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]
Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually real resemblance very important to appeal? A good meta-data off actual and identified similarity. Diary regarding Social and personal Relationships, twenty five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction given that an effective predictor off similarity analysis; A test of one’s attraction-resemblance hypothesis. Record out-of Social and personal Relationships, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]
Diary from Societal and private Relationships, 23, 865-880
Morry, https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/kubanska-datingsajter/ Meters. Meters. (2007). The newest interest-similarity theory one of cross-sex relatives: Matchmaking satisfaction, understood similarities, and you may worry about-offering perceptions. Log out of Personal and personal Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and expansion of your own SVR principle of dyadic combining. Log off ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will separation and divorce: Good 14-season longitudinal study of black lovers and you can light partners. Record out-of Public and personal Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love formula Matches believes it’s discovered a formula having ruling the web dating providers: A technical way to find Mr. or Ms. Right. Business dos.0 Journal. Retrieved into the out-of [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent survive – Identification parallels when you look at the people. Identity and you may Individual Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover needs: Just what properties create folk focus within their quick-term sexual and you may much time-label romantic partners? Record from Mindset and Human Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh role of your mind throughout the initiation and you will course of societal correspondence. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]
